肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 777-801.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

经肝动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗早期肝癌的效果

靖长友, 朱桐, 张永宏, 李建军   

  1. 北京 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院 肝病与肿瘤介入治疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-04 出版日期:2024-07-31 发布日期:2024-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 李建军,Email: ljjir@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院中青年人才培养计划(YARCKA2022002)

The time interval between TACE and ablation therapy: A single-center retrospective study on the treatment efficacy for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma

JING Chang-you, ZHU Tong, ZHANG Yong-hong, LI Jian-jun   

  1. Department of Hepatic Disease and Tumor Interventional Treatment Center, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2023-11-04 Online:2024-07-31 Published:2024-08-27
  • Contact: Li Jian-jun, Email: ljjir@163.com

摘要: 目的 比较经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后不同时间间隔联合射频消融(RFA)治疗早期肝细胞癌(HCC)疗效。方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年12月在首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院接受TACE联合RFA治疗的早期HCC患者的临床资料。根据患者TACE治疗后接受RFA治疗的时间间隔分为两组:A组(0~14 d)22例,B组(15~30 d)34例。研究的主要终点是总生存期(OS)及无进展生存期(PFS),同时对患者预后的影响因素进行多因素分析。结果 56例患者中,BCLC分期0期20例,A期36例。单因素分析显示肿瘤分期与肝癌的预后相关(P<0.05),多因素分析肿瘤分期(RR=0.045,95% CI: 0.003~0.623,P=0.021)是影响TACE联合RFA治疗HCC预后的独立危险因素。A组的5年生存率78%,B组为75%;A组和B组的5年无进展生存率分别为14%和11%。A组和B组的PFS分别为23个月和31个月,两组的OS均为60个月。A组和B组的PFS(HR=1.085,P=0.795)和OS(HR=0.514, P=0.416)差异无统计学意义。结论 TACE联合RFA治疗HCC患者的肿瘤分期越早,预后越好。而TACE与消融的时间间隔对疗效无影响,TACE后30 d内行RFA安全有效。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 射频消融, 时间间隔, 肝动脉化疗栓塞

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) at 0-14 or 15-30 days after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with early HCC who underwent combined TACE and RFA treatment at Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, between 2011 and 2013. Based on the time interval between TACE and RFA treatment, the study was divided into two groups: Group A (0-14 days) and Group B (15-30 days). The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with a multifactorial analysis of factors influencing patient prognosis. Results A total of 56 patients were included in this study. Among them, 22 were classified as BCLC stage 0 and 34 as stage A. By univariate analysis it was indicated that the tumor stage and the degree of liver cirrhosis were correlated with the prognosis of liver cancers (P<0.05). By multifactorial analysis it was identified that the tumor stage (RR=0.045, 95% CI:0.003-0.623, P=0.021) as an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of HCC treated with combined TACE and RFA therapy. By subgroup analysis it was showed a 5-year survival rate of 78% for Group A and 75% for Group B; the 5-year progression-free survival rates were 14% and 11% for Groups A and B, respectively. The median progression-free survival times were 23 months for Group A and 31 months for Group B, with median overall survival times of 60 months for both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in progression-free1 survival (HR=1.085, P=0.795) and overall survival (HR=0.514, P=0.416) between Groups A and B. Conclusion For HCC patients treated with combined TACE and RFA, better prognosis is associated with earlier tumor staging. The timing interval between TACE and ablation therapy, whether within 14 days or more than 14 days (15-30 days), does not significantly affect the efficacy against hepatocellular carcinoma. RFA within 30 days after TACE is safe and effective.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Radiofrequency ablation, Time interval, Transarterial chemoembolization