肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 534-537.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

增强CT纹理参数在HBV相关肝细胞癌介入治疗效果评估中的应用

杨菁菁, 李莎, 蔡明月   

  1. 214000 江苏 江南大学附属无锡五院影像科
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-30 出版日期:2024-05-31 发布日期:2024-08-28
  • 基金资助:
    无锡市科技计划项目(CSZONZ1708)

Application of enhanced CT texture parameters in evaluation of efficacy after interventional therapy for Hepatitis B associated hepatocellular carcinoma

YANG Jing-jing, LI Sha, CAI Ming-yue   

  1. Department of Imaging, Wuxi Fifth Hospital Affiliated to Jiangnan University, Jiangsu 214000, China
  • Received:2023-05-30 Online:2024-05-31 Published:2024-08-28

摘要: 目的 探讨增强CT纹理参数在HBV相关肝细胞癌(HCC)介入治疗预后不良预测中的效能。方法 将2020年10月—2022年10月江南大学附属无锡五院收治的69例HBV相关HCC患者纳入研究。治疗前行增强CT扫描,根据肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)疗效分为预后不良及良好组,分别为14、55例。比较两组基线资料及增强CT纹理参数水平;以ROC曲线分析各指标对预后不良的预测价值;分析明确HCC患者TACE预后不良的危险因素。结果 两组性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤直径、吸烟人数比例、峰度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);预后不良组门静脉转移人数比例、偏度、熵值、平均值水平(78.57 %、1.38±0.39、2.29±0.41、88.65±15.72)明显高于预后良好组(38.18 %, 0.80±0.26, 1.77±0.35, 66.94±11.07),能量水平[(1.71±0.48)×106]明显低于预后良好组[(5.14±1.35)×106](P<0.05)。ROC结果显示,偏度、能量、熵值、平均值预测HCC患者预后不良的曲线下面积分别为0.884、0.825、0.795、0.864(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,门静脉转移、偏度≥1.020、能量≤2.415×106、熵值≥2.265、平均值≥80.495为HCC预后不良的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 门静脉转移及增强CT纹理参数中的偏度、能量、熵值、平均值能够用于预测HCC患者TACE治疗预后不良,临床在治疗前需对以上指标进行关注,采取措施改善患者预后。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 增强CT, 介入治疗, 纹理参数, 疗效评估

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy of enhanced CT texture parameters in predicting poor prognosis after interventional therapy for hepatitis B associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A total of 69 patients diagnosed with hepatitis B-related HCC and admitted to our hospital between October 2020 and October 2022 were included in the study. The patients underwent enhanced CT scans before treatment and were then divided into two groups based on the efficacy of hepatic artery chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a poor prognosis group consisting of 14 patients and a good prognosis group consisting of 55 patients. Comparative analysis was conducted on baseline data and enhanced CT texture parameter levels between the two groups. The predictive value of various indicators in determining poor prognosis was evaluated through ROC curves, and risk factors associated with poor prognosis in HCC patients after TACE treatment were identified. Results No significant disparities were found in terms of gender, age, BMI, tumor diameter, proportion of smokers, and kurtosis between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the poor prognosis group exhibited notably higher values in terms of proportion, skewness, entropy and mean value of portal vein metastasis (78.57 %, 1.38±0.39, 2.29±0.41, 88.65±15.72) compared to those in the good prognosis group (38.18 %, 0.80±0.26, 1.77±0.35, 66.94±11.07). Additionally, the energy level [(1.71±0.48) ×106] was significantly lower in the poor prognosis group in comparison to the good prognosis group [(5.14±1.35) ×106] (P<0.05). The ROC analysis revealed that the areas under the curve of skewness, energy, entropy, and mean value in predicting poor prognosis of HCC patients were 0.884, 0.825, 0.795 and 0.864, respectively, all with statistical significance (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis highlighted portal vein metastasis, skewness ≥ 1.020, and energy ≤ 2.415 ×106, entropy value ≥ 2.265, and average value ≥ 80.495 as risk factors for poor prognosis in HCC patients (P<0.05). Conclusion The texture parameters of portal vein metastasis and enhanced CT, including skewness, energy, entropy and average value, have been identified as potential prognostic predictors for poor prognosis in HCC patients after TACE treatment. It is essential to consider these indicators before treatment and take appropriate measures to improve patient prognosis.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Enhanced CT, Interventional therapy, Texture parameter, Efficacy evaluation