Efficacy evaluation of liver stiffness measurement, spleen thickness and splenic vein diameter in predicting esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis
QIAN Yu-xin, DU Ming-shu, ZHANG Pei
2024, 29(12):
1517-1520.
Asbtract
(
13 )
PDF (386KB)
(
3
)
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To explore the efficacy of noninvasive indexes such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM), spleen thickness (ST) and splenic vein diameter (SVD) in predicting esophageal varices (EV) in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis.Methods 154 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis admitted to the Third Medical Center of the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army between April 2019 and December 2022 were reviewed. The diagnosis of hepatitis B cirrhosis and EV meets the standard. According to gastroscopy, the degree of EV is divided into mild, moderate and severe. We compared the clinical data of patients with or without EV and different EV degrees, analyzed the difference of diagnostic efficiency of LSM, ST and SVD in predicting EV, followed up and observed the occurrence of EVB in EV patients, and compared it with cases without EVB.Results Among 154 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis, there were 97 cases without EV and 57 cases with EV. 22 cases (38.6%), 24 cases (42.1%) and 11 cases (19.3%) were Child-Pugh A, B and C in patients with EV, and 58 cases (59.8%), 39 cases (40.2%) and 0(0) were Child-Pugh A, B and C in patients without EV. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In EV group, ascites, PLT, Alb, INR, LSM, ST and SVD were 31 cases (54.4%), (76.1±11.7) ×109/L, (27.9±4.6) g/L, (1.3±0.4) and (29.1±10.4) kPa, (45.6±12.4) mm and (10.4±3.2) mm, and, there was a statistically significant difference when compared with the group without EV [2 cases (2.1%), (129.5±16.4) × 109/L, (34.0±3.9) g/L, (1.0±0.2), (14.6±5.5) kPa, (35.3±8.0) mm and (7.6±2.1) mm] (P<0.05). According to the results of gastroscopy, there were 23 cases of mild, 19 cases of moderate and 15 cases of hepatitis B cirrhosis complicated with EV. The LSM, ST and SVD of patients with severe EV were (40.2±17.6) kPa, (53.3±15.0) mm and (13.8±3.2) mm, compared with mild EV [(21.6±9.2) kPa, (40.2±11.1) mm and (7.9±2.3) mm] and moderate EV [(29.3±13.2) kPa, (46.0±12.7) mm and (10.7±3.2) mm], the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). According to the analysis of ROC curve, the AUC value of LSM, ST and SVD in the joint diagnosis of EV in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis was significantly higher than that of LSM, ST and SVD alone (P<0.05), and the AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of LSM, ST and SVD in the joint diagnosis were 0.91 (0.83 ~ 0.98), 89.5% and 83.5% respectively. During a one-year follow-up observation, 21 cases (36.8%) of EV patients developed EVB, and the treatments included esophageal variceal ligation (EVL), sclerosing agent injection, EVL combined with tissue glue injection, EVL combined with sclerosing agent and tissue glue injection were applied in 15 cases (71.4%), 4 cases (19.0%), 1 case (4.8%), and 1 case (4.8%) respectively. LSM, ST and SVD in EVB patients were significantly higher than those in non-EVB groups (P<0.05).Conclusion Using LSM, spleen ST or SVD, and other parameters to predict hepatitis B cirrhosis complicated with EV has certain diagnostic value, which can be used for primary screening in clinic and is worthy of further research and application.