Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 196-198.

• Liver Cancer • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure for hepatocellular carcinoma by model for end-stage liver disease and standardized future liver remnant

ZHANG Feng-xiao, BAI Xue-song, HU Jinghua   

  1. Department of Infection, Zhoukou Central Hospital, Zhoukou 460000, China
  • Received:2021-04-06 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-04-19

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the value of standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) and score of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods From October 2015 to February 2021, seventy-four HCC patients including 58 males and 16 females who underwent abdominal three-dimensional CT reconstruction and hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to explore the influencing factors related to PHLF. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the independent influencing factors of PHLF. Results There were 28 PHLF cases (PHLF group) and 46 non-PHLF cases (non-PHLF group) in 74 HCC patients. The PLT, Alb, sFLR and MELD scores of patients in PHLF group and non-PHLF group were 123 (29, 238)×109/L and 168 (38, 538)×109/L, 36.3 (26.0, 41.2) g/L and 42.8 (25.6, 48.8) g/L, 0.50 (0.38, 0.78) and 0.67(0.36, 0.99), 9 (6,12) points and 7 (6,10) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in age, sex, PT, INR, ALT, HBsAg and tumor diameter between these two groups (P>0.05). The scores of PLT, Alb, sFLR and MELD were included in multivariate Logistic regression analysis, and the result showed that PLT, Alb, sFLR and MELD were independent predictors of PHLF in HCC patients (P<0.05). The cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity of sFLR in diagnosing PHLF in HCC patients were 0.54, 76.9% and 73.9%, respectively, while the cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity of MELD score in diagnosing PHLF in HCC patients were 8.5, 53.8% and 82.6%, respectively. The AUC value of sFLR in combination with MELD score in diagnosing PHLF in HCC patients were significantly higher than that of sFLR or MELD score alone (P<0.05). Conclusion sFLR in combination with MELD score is an effective index to predict PHLF in HCC patients. This prediction model can effectively guide the early treatment, improve prognosis and reduce mortality of HCC patients after hepatectomy, and provide a new method for preoperative evaluation.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Post-hepatectomy liver failure, Standardized future liver remnant, Model for end-stage liver disease