Performance comparison between QIAGEN real-time PCR and COBAS TaqMan for serum HBV DNA quantitation in predicting the pathological state of liver tissue from chronic hepatitis B patients
ZHANG Zhan-qing, LU Wei, WANG Ping-an, WANG Yan-bing, ZHOU Xin-lan, DING Rong-rong, LI Xiu-fen, HUANG Dan
2016, 21(4):
241-247.
Asbtract
(
227 )
PDF (1254KB)
(
411
)
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To investigate and compare the performance of QIAGEN real-time PCR and COBAS TaqMan for serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitation in predicting the pathological state of liver tissue from chronic hepatitis B patients.Methods A total of 278 patients with chronic hepatitis B, including 162 HBeAg-positive and 116 HBeAg-negative ones, were enrolled in this study. Serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and HBV DNA (COBAS) were detected by real-time quantitative PCR and Roche TaqMan COBAS system, respectively. The Scheuer score system used for pathological diagnosis of liver tissue had 5 grades (G0-G4) and 5 stages (S0-S4), respectively. Results In HBeAg-positive patients, there were statistically significant differences of serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and HBV DNA (COBAS) between G2 and G3, S1 and S4, S2 and S4, S3 and S4 (all P<0.05), respectively; in HBeAg-negative patients, there were statistically significant differences between G1 and G2, G1 and G3, S1 and S2, S1 and S3, S1 and S4 (all P<0.05), respectively. Rates of disagreement between serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and HBV DNA (COBAS) quantitation of G1-2, G3, S1-3 and S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were 4.24% (5/118), 9.09% (4/44), 3.68%(5/136) and 7.69%(2/26), respectively; and the rates of G1, G2-3, S1 and S2-4 in HBeAg-negative patients were 6.02% (5/83), 3.03% (1/33), 3.29% (2/61) and 3.64% (2/55), respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and serum HBV DNA (COBAS) for predicting ≥G3 and S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were 0.645 and 0.695, 0.703 and 0.755, respectively; and the areas for predicting ≥G2 and ≥S2 in HBeAg-negative patients were 0.848 and 0.817, 0.756 and 0.756, respectively. Optimal cut-offs of serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and serum HBV DNA (COBAS) for predicting S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were ≤3.784×106 IU/mL and ≤6.668×107 IU/mL, respectively; and the corresponding sensitivities and specificities were 0.654 and 1.000, 0.735 and 0.581, respectively; and the optimal cut-offs of serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and serum HBV DNA (COBAS) for predicting ≥G2 in HBeAg-negative patients were ≥5.821×103 IU/mL and 9.311×103 IU/mL, respectively; and the corresponding sensitivities and specificities were 0.970 and 0.909, 0.614 and 0.651, respectively. Conclusion The most efficiency of serum HBV DNA for predicting the pathological state of liver tissue is characterized by predicting ≥G2 in HBeAg negative patients, and there is a high consistance of the performance between serum HBV DNA (QIAGEN) and serum HBV DNA (COBAS) for predicting ≥G2 in HBeAg negative patients.